Cases 101 - 110 of 159
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1318
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Jesus et al v. Holder et al
as 1:2011cv00591
Plaintiff:
Anguiano Jesus, Rudy Martinez and Oscar Munez-Medina
Defendant:
Eric Holder, Cibola Correctional Center, Corrections Corporation of America and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Majors v. Thomas Jefferson School of Law et al
as 2:2011cv00558
Plaintiff:
Jesse Anne Majors
Defendant:
Thomas Jefferson School of Law , Rudy Hasl, Jeffrey Joseph and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Burns v. Buford, et al
as 11-1260
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DOUGLAS BURNS
Defendant - Appellee:
STACEY BUFORD, JOHN DOE, Colorado Attorney General, R. N. WOLFF and others
Sierra-Garcia v. Hawks et al
as 1:2011cv00410
Plaintiff:
Crystal Sierra-Garcia
Defendant:
Hawks, Robbie Bolton, Patricia Montez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Auto-Owners Insurance Company et al
as 1:2011cv00413
Plaintiff:
Rudy Thomas
Defendant:
Auto-Owners Insurance Company and Bristol West Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fox v. California Franchise Tax Board, et al
as 11-1037
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JEFFREY D. FOX
Defendant - Appellee:
CALIFORNIA FRANCHISE TAX BOARD, a California State Agency, JOHN CHIANG, Chairman-California Franchise Tax Board, individually and in his official capacity, RICK WARD, individually and in his official capacity and others
Frischenmeyer v. Werholtz et al
as 6:2010cv01430
Plaintiff:
Michael J. Frischenmeyer
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz , Robert Hinshaw , Unknown Eighteenth Judicial District Court Judge and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company v. C H Guernsey & Company et al
as 5:2010cv01331
Plaintiff:
Southwestern Bell Telephone Company
Defendant:
C H Guernsey & Company and Rudy Construction Co
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
