Cases filed in the Tenth Circuit Courts
Cases 11 - 20 of 54
Barney v. Adult Probation & Parole et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00084
Plaintiff: Jeremy Bryan Barney and Jeremy Bryan Barney Randall
Defendant: Adult Probation & Parole, James Adamson and Matthew Jensen
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Needham v. Roberts
as 19-4143
Defendant / Appellee: FNU BERTRAM, Medical Tech, GARY G. KUHLMANN, Appellate Attorney, SIDNEY ROBERTS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARON DAVID TRENT NEEDHAM
Thayne v. Martin et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00581
Defendant: Makolson Antoine, Tanner Martin, Austin Edwards and others
Plaintiff: Trent Thayne
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Needham v. Holman, et al
as 19-4076
Defendant / Appellee: FNU GARDNER, NICHOLAS TURNER, GREG ADAMSON and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: AARON DAVID TRENT NEEDHAM
Standard Hemp, LLC et al v. Silen et al
as 1:2019cv01162
Defendant: Shawn Adamson, Mark Silen, Mark (I) Silen and others
Plaintiff: Standard Hemp, LLC and John Michael Merritt, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sullivan v. Harris, et al
as 19-8009
Defendant / Appellee: GEORGE R. HARRIS and ADAMSON GEITTMAN, P.C.
Plaintiff / Appellant: SUSAN W. SULLIVAN
Sullivan v. Harris et al
as 2:2018cv00141
Plaintiff: Susan W Sullivan
Defendant: George R Harris and Adamson Geittman PC
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Adamson et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company et al
as 4:2018cv00432
Defendant: Union Pacific Railroad Company and Lloyd Plymale
Plaintiff: Billy Graves and Richard Adamson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2617
Adamson v. Lawson et al
as 6:2018cv01077
Defendant: Lloyd Lawson and Team Industrial Services, Inc.
Plaintiff: Natalie Adamson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Robinson v. Lawton City of et al
as 5:2016cv00869
Plaintiff: Margie M Robinson
Defendant: Lawton City of , Chelsey L Gordon, Timothy T Jenkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?