Cases 11 - 20 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2017cv00053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Woodson v. McCollum et al
as 5:2017cv00094
Plaintiff:
Marcus D Woodson
Defendant:
Tracy McCollum , Bruce Bornhiem , Joe Allbaugh and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Dorado et al v. Campos et al
as 2:2017cv00029
Plaintiff:
Cheryl Dorado and John Dorado
Defendant:
James Campos , Alice Monk and John Doe Campos
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Monk v. Social Security Administration
as 1:2016cv01185
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Monk
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Trujillo v. Management and Training Corporation et al
as 2:2015cv00544
Plaintiff:
Victor Trujillo
Defendant:
Management and Training Corporation, Larry Monks, James Frawner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cantu Services Inc v. Monk et al
as 5:2014cv00860
Plaintiff:
Cantu Services Inc
Defendant:
Kevin Monk , Renee Ellender Roberie , Joseph Burton and others
Intervenor:
Blackstone Consulting Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Corvax Oil and Gas Land Services, LLC v. Jameson et al
as 1:2013cv00065
Plaintiff:
Corvax Oil and Gas Land Services, LLC
Defendant:
Gloria Jameson, Norman Brown, Franklin D. Bayless and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
In re: Knox
as 12-7060
Petitioner:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Respondent:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
Essex Insurance Company v. Bayless et al
as 6:2012cv00226
Plaintiff:
Essex Insurance Company
Defendant:
Tina Bayless, All Star Tavern, LLC, James Monk and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
United States of America v. 2007 Yamaha YZF-R6 Motorcycle et al
as 1:2011cv01022
Defendant:
2007 Yamaha YZF-R6 Motorcycle
Claimant:
Nathan Monk
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 21 U.S.C. § 881
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
