Cases 21 - 30 of 1,073
Rich v. Ceiss et al
as 5:2024cv00205
Plaintiff:
JT Rich
Defendant:
Cortnie Ciess, Jerry Hurburger, Cheyenne Underwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
A. et al v. Independence Blue Cross et al
as 2:2024cv00135
Plaintiff:
Mark A., Tracy A. and M.A.
Defendant:
Independence Blue Cross, QCC Insurance Company and Independence Personal Choice PPO Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Prescott (PS) v. Hopkins et al
as 1:2024cv00512
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Terrie Hopkins, Tanya Hudnall, Ron Steffa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prescott (PS) v. Hicks et al
as 1:2024cv00404
Plaintiff:
Anthony Prescott
Defendant:
Tiara Hicks, Debora A. Adams, Andrew C. Brazeal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Madriz v. Rock et al
as 2:2024cv00101
Plaintiff:
Pablo Madriz
Defendant:
Melanie Rock, Tracy S. Gruber and Michelle Hofmann
Not Yet Classified:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Are You Listening Yet PAC et al v. Henderson
as 2:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
Are You Listening Yet PAC and Tracie Halvorsen
Defendant:
Deidre Henderson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ahmad et al v. Mayorkas et al
as 2:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
Khalid Mohammad Theeb Ahmad and Mariam Ihsan Kergaye
Defendant:
Alejandro N. Mayorkas, Ur M. Jaddou, Tracy Tarango and others
Not Yet Classified:
USAO Notice Immigration Case
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0702 Administrative Procedure Act
Rich v. Marsh et al
as 4:2024cv00010
Plaintiff:
Jordan Rich
Defendant:
Cody Marsh, Deb Haaland, Department of the Interior, The and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Nixon v. Woodman of the World, et al
as 24-1003
Plaintiff:
TRACY NIXON
Defendant:
WOODMAN OF THE WORLD, ASSURED LIFE ASSOCIATION, RICKEY B. FERGUSON and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
