Cases 21 - 30 of 32
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv02740
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Knox v. Sockey, et al
as 11-7054
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
W.A. SOCKEY, Dentist, AMANDA WORKMAN, Dental Assistant, CHESTER MASON, Health Service Administrator and others
R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC v. Telluride Regional Airport Authority
as 1:2011cv01658
Plaintiff:
R.E. Monks Construction Co., LLC
Defendant:
Telluride Regional Airport Authority
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pemberton v. Jones, et al
as 11-6138
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL CURTIS PEMBERTON
Defendant - Appellee:
JUSTIN JONES, Director DOC, JAMES RUDEK, Warden, OKLAHOMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and others
Knox v. Aldridge, et al
as 10-7035
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTONE L. KNOX
Defendant - Appellee:
DEBRA ALDRIDGE, D & E Unit Manager, OSP, AMY THOMAS, D Unit Case Manager, OSP, BRIAN HOLDEN, D Unit Mental Health Officer, OSP and others
Knox v. Aldridge et al
as 6:2010cv00044
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
Debra Aldridge, Amy Thomas, Brian Holden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Benning et al v. Gomez et al
as 1:2009cv00849
Plaintiff:
Trevelyn A Benning, Patricia Buckner and Bryant S Monk
Defendant:
Juan Gomez, Edward Villareal, John Doe, I and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Knox v. Sockey et al
as 6:2009cv00274
Plaintiff:
Antone L. Knox
Defendant:
W.A. Sockey, Amanda Workman, Vickie Harless and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Monks v. Astrue
as 1:2009cv00445
Plaintiff:
James Monks
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
R E Monks Construction v. City of St. George
as 2:2009cv00184
Plaintiff:
R.E. Monks Construction
Defendant:
City of St. George
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
