Cases 21 - 30 of 201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2022cv00125
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Thomas v. CoreCivic Facility Support Center et al
as 5:2021cv03166
Plaintiff:
Tony B. Thomas
Defendant:
CoreCivic Facility Support Center, (fnu) Necho, (fnu) Barton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01753
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Rodgers v. Social Security Administration Commissioner
as 0:2021cv00122
Defendant:
Social Security Administration Commissioner and Andrew Saul
Plaintiff:
Michael Justin Rodgers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Aloba v. Gulickson, et al
as 21-6063
Defendant / Appellee:
FNU LNU, Warden, DAVID FRAIZER, J. RODGERS and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ORIYOMI ALOBA
Rodgers v. Crow
as 21-5032
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT CROW, Director
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM BUCK RODGERS
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
Koel v. Citizens Medical Center, Inc. et al
as 2:2021cv02166
Defendant:
SAM FUNK, DANIEL KUHLMAN, Citizens Medical Center Inc and others
Plaintiff:
RICKY KOEL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aloba v. Gulickson et al
as 5:2021cv00286
Defendant:
C Gulickson, John Doe, K Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Oriyomi Aloba
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brunson v. Adams et al
as 2:2021cv00175
Defendant:
Ben Sasse, David Scott, Lisa Murkowski and others
Plaintiff:
Loy Arlan Brunson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation of Constitutional Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
