Cases 21 - 30 of 142
Harris v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2021cv00357
Plaintiff:
Shelley Harris
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2021cv01129
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Aguilera-Valdez v. Davenport et al
as 1:2021cv01209
Defendant:
Cordova Towing LLC, Mario Diaz, Karen Wilson and others
Plaintiff:
Zain Aguilera-Valdez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Unum Life Insurance Company of America v. Jackson et al
as 4:2021cv00025
Defendant:
Shelley S Jackson, Stephen E. Jackson and Shelley E Jackson Foundation, The, Stephanie A Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Unum Life Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Twiford v. Correctional Health Partners, LLC et al
as 1:2019cv03587
Defendant:
Steven Dawson, Wellington Duplessis, Monika Lovric and others
Plaintiff:
Rainer James Twiford Jr. and James Rainer Twiford, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayford v. Whittaker
as 2:2020cv00631
Defendant:
Shelley Whittaker
Plaintiff:
Andrew Hayford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freebird Communications, et al v. Roberts, et al
as 20-3182
Defendant / Appellee:
MATTHEW WILFRED ROBERTS and SHELLEY D. GARZA-ROBERTS
Plaintiff / Appellant:
FREEBIRD COMMUNICATIONS, INC. PROFIT SHARING PLAN, MICHAEL SCARCELLO and FREEBIRD COMMUNICATIONS, INC.
Jackson v. eLynx Technologies, LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00344
Defendant:
Samantha McPheter and eLynx Technologies, LLC
Plaintiff:
Shelley Jackson
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001
Vansickle v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00247
Plaintiff:
Shelley L. Vansickle
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
