Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Johnson et al v. Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02121
Defendant:
Hill's Pet Nutrition, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Angelina Raines, David Johnson and Kayla Vanwinsen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ullery v. Bradley, et al
as 19-1079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SUSAN ULLERY
Defendant:
DAVID URICH, in his individual and official capacity, SCOTT SMITH, in his individual and official capacity, TERRY JACQUES, in his individual and official capacity and others
Defendant / Appellant:
BRUCE BRADLEY, in his individual and official capacity
United States v. Johnson
as 19-4000
Defendant / Appellant:
JEREMY DAVID JOHNSON
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Ryan v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2018cv00956
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Rick Raemisch, David (I) Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Shawnee Ryan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ullery v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2018cv00839
Plaintiff:
Susan Ullery
Defendant:
David Johnson, White, Bruce Bradley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charity v. Raemisch et al
as 1:2017cv00883
Plaintiff:
Brenda Charity
Defendant:
Rick Raemisch, David Johnson, Denver Women's Correctional Facility and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Johnson
as 17-4012
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JEREMY DAVID JOHNSON
Johnson v. Melton Truck Lines, et al
as 17-5018
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
MELTON TRUCK LINES, INC. and GREAT WEST CASUALTY COMPANY
Crane, et al v. Corecivic et al
as 2:2017cv02031
Plaintiff:
Adam Crane and David Johnson
Defendant:
Corecivic and Securus Technologies, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Non-Motor Vehicle
Rogers v. DeCesaro et al
as 1:2016cv02733
Plaintiff:
Bionca Charmaine Rogers
Defendant:
A. Anthony DeCesaro, Michelle Brothers, Terry Jaques and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
