Cases 31 - 40 of 197
Jackson (ID 116218) v. Ash et al
as 5:2020cv03252
Defendant:
Charles Patrick, Donald Ash and Jeffrey S. Fewell
Plaintiff:
Sacharey T. Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Schmidt, et al
as 20-3168
Defendant / Appellee:
RAY ROBERTS, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections, S. SCRIBNER, ReEntry Department, Kansas Department of Corrections, JEFF ZMUDA, Secretary of Corrections, Kansas Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RONALD E. JOHNSON
Ash v. Aurora Public Schools
as 20-1286
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GEORGE CHRISTOPHER ASH
Defendant / Appellee:
AURORA PUBLIC SCHOOLS
Vann (ID 76997) v. Fewell et al
as 5:2020cv03200
Defendant:
John Doe, J. Patrick, (fnu) Schuler and others
Plaintiff:
Durayl Vann
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sowl v. Loveland, City of et al
as 1:2020cv01820
Defendant:
Loveland, City of, Paul Ashe, Brian Bartnes and others
Plaintiff:
Preston Sowl
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sutton v. Sledd et al
as 5:2020cv03105
Defendant:
James Spies, Sara Toms, Bryanna Hanschu and others
Plaintiff:
Kyle J. Sutton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bradley v. Ash et al
as 5:2020cv03082
Defendant:
John Does 1-5, (fnu) Jones, (fnu) David and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Carter Bradley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maldonado-Passage v. U.S. Federal Wildlife Services et al
as 5:2020cv00248
Defendant:
U.S. Federal Wildlife Services, United States Department of Interior, James Brandon Garretson and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph Maldonado-Passage
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Florez v. Ash et al
as 2:2020cv02050
Defendant:
John or Jane Doe 7, John or Jane Doe 4, John or Jane Doe 1 and others
Plaintiff:
Jesus Florez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson (ID 79020) v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2020cv03017
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Johnnie Goddard, Jennifer L. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
