Cases 41 - 50 of 59
Hooper v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2012cv00271
Plaintiff:
Amber D. Hooper
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Utah Division of Consumer Protection et al v. Johnson et al
as 2:2011mc01207
Petitioner:
Utah Division of Consumer Protection
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Johnson, Duane Fielding , Andy Johnson and others
Claimant:
249 Investors
Receiver:
Robb Evans
Intervenor:
SunFirst Bank
Cause Of Action: Motion to Quash
Hooper v. Workman
as 11-6143
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL EDWARD HOOPER
Respondent - Appellee:
RANDALL G. WORKMAN, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Federal Trade Commission v. Johnson et al
as 1:2011mc00006
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Jeremy (I) Johnson, Jeremy Johnson, Duane (I) Fielding and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Johnson et al
as 2:2011mc00085
Plaintiff:
Federal Trade Commission
Defendant:
Jeremy D. Johnson, Duane Fielding, Andy Johnson and others
Receiver:
Robb Evans
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0754
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00910
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Ziegler Holdings, LLC v. Hooper
as 1:2010cv01381
Plaintiff:
Ziegler Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Erin R. Hooper
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Guinn v. Lakewood Police Department et al
as 1:2010cv00827
Plaintiff:
Bill Guinn
Defendant:
Lakewood Police Department, Nancy Hooper, Jefferson County District Attorney's Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hooper v. Underwriters at Lloyd's London et al
as 5:2009cv01330
Plaintiff:
Chet Hooper
Defendant:
Underwriters at Lloyd's London and Tapco Underwriters Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Monitronics Funding v. Akaki et al
as 2:2009cv00550
Plaintiff:
Monitronics Funding and Monitronics Funding
Defendant:
Krislen Akaki, Nate Barney, Mike Burch and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Trademark
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
