Cases 51 - 60 of 133
Cramer et al v. Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners et al
as 5:2018cv00179
Plaintiff:
Angela Cramer , Aimee Drake , Donella Epps and others
Defendant:
Oklahoma County Board of County Commissioners and David Hooten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Malone v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2018cv00225
Plaintiff:
Carlos Malone
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hendrix v. Ellifritt et al
as 6:2017cv00353
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Hendrix
Defendant:
John Earl Ellifritt and CRST Malone, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Malone v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2017cv02254
Plaintiff:
Patricia Malone
Interested_party:
SSA Noticing and USAO-SS-Noticing
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Malone et al v. Wynnewood City of et al
as 5:2017cv00527
Plaintiff:
Vickie Malone , Teddie Cheek , Rio Youngblood and others
Defendant:
Wynnewood City of and Joshua Franklin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Kher v. Haji et al
as 1:2017cv00758
Plaintiff:
Jim Kher
Defendant:
Walid Elias Haji, Colorado 2nd Judicial District, Michael Anthony Martinez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lynn (ID 64377) v. McCurrie et al
as 5:2017cv03041
Plaintiff:
Patrick C. Lynn
Defendant:
Anthony McCurrie, (fnu) Fortier, Derek Sweigart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Malone v. Royal
as 17-6027
Petitioner - Appellant:
RICKY RAY MALONE
Respondent - Appellee:
TERRY ROYAL, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary
Malone v. Associated Wholesale Grocers et al
as 4:2016cv00761
Plaintiff:
Patricia S Malone
Defendant:
Ranch Acres Associates, LLC , Sherman, Clay & Co. and SClay Management, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Grimes v. Fox et al
as 5:2016cv01446
Plaintiff:
Jerome L Grimes
Defendant:
Daniel Fox, FNU Fox, Jarrell Robertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
