Cases 81 - 90 of 279
Johnson (ID 79020) v. Schmidt et al
as 5:2020cv03017
Defendant:
Roger Werholtz, Johnnie Goddard, Jennifer L. Myers and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald E. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Seale v. Peacock
as 1:2019cv03559
Plaintiff:
Bryan Seale
Defendant:
John Jane Doe and Gary Peacock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Craig Cunningham v. Technologic USA, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv00231
Plaintiff:
Craig Cunningham
Defendant:
Technologic USA, Inc. and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227
Ward v. Lutheran Medical Center, et al
as 19-1431
Defendant / Appellee:
JANE DOE TRAVELER NURSE 2, HALL & EVANS, LLC, Law Firm, JOHN/JANE DOE, Clinical Nurse Manager and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ANTHONY D. WARD
Gonzales v. Palo Alto Inc, et al.
as 1:2019cv01029
Plaintiff:
Ray Gonzales
Defendant:
Palo Alto Inc and John/Jane Does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Ortega v. Phaneof et al
as 1:2019cv00893
Defendant:
John Valdez, John Garcia, John/Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Max Ortega
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spotts v. Avalos, et al
as 19-1366
Defendant / Appellee:
ROOT, RECREATION SUPERVISOR, MATEVOUSIAN, Complex Warden and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KELVIN ANDRE SPOTTS
Truman v. Orem City, et al
as 19-4133
Plaintiff / Appellant:
CONRAD TRUMAN
Defendant / Appellee:
OREM CITY, a Utah municipality, DEPUTY UTAH COUNTY ATTORNEY CRAIG JOHNSON, an individual; OFFICER(S) JOHN/JANE DOE 110, individuals; ATTORNEY(S) JOHN/JANE DOE 1-5, OREM CITY POLICE OFFICER THOMAS WALLACE, an individual and others
Henry et al v. Lewis et al
as 5:2019cv00714
Plaintiff:
Charles Henry and OKC-Northeast High School Alumni Association
Defendant:
Sean McDaniel, Jessica Sherrill, Paula Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pratt (ID 111692) v. Laiter et al
as 5:2019cv03144
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe (2), (fnu) Laiter, John/Jane Doe (1) and others
Plaintiff:
Bradlee Pratt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
