Cases 1 - 10 of 69
Chan et al v. Joseph et al
as 5:2024cv00963
Defendant:
Ashlie Pruitt and Mina Joseph
Plaintiff:
Laura Brittany Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Burge et al v. RTS Water Solutions LLC et al
as 6:2024cv00298
Plaintiff:
Oshanna Burge and Christopher Burge
Defendant:
John Doe, John Doe II, RTS Water Solutions LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Curry (PS) v. Colorado Housing and Finance Authority et al
as 1:2024cv02128
Plaintiff:
Channing D. Curry
Defendant:
Colorado Housing and Finance Authority and Bison Title Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Burge et al v. RTS Water Solutions LLC et al
as 5:2024cv00760
Defendant:
Yuk Shing Chan, John Doe, John Doe II and others
Plaintiff:
Christopher Burge and Oshanna Burge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01573
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv01211
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Weiser et al
as 1:2024cv01000
Plaintiff:
Jason Ray Clark
Defendant:
Philip J. Weiser, India Kidd-Aaron, Patty Salazar and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Chan (PS) v. No Named Defendant
as 1:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Nai Lyi Chan
Defendant:
No Named Defendant, Christina Apostoli and Kelly Lafave
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chan-Barbosa v. Garland
as 24-9510
Petitioner:
ABNER NATANAEL CHAN-BARBOSA
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, United States Attorney General
Chan (PS) v. Chai Mai Roon, et al
as 1:2024cv00089
Petitioner:
Nai Lyi Chan
Respondent:
No Named Respondents, Chan Mai Roon, Htaw Rot and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
