Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Jaquez v. Dallis et al
as 6:2023cv00096
Plaintiff:
Henry Joseph Jaquez
Defendant:
Rachel Dallis, Jason Chenault, Johnny Dallis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Fleming v. Mayes Emergency Services Trust Authority et al
as 4:2022cv00089
Plaintiff:
Robert Fleming
Defendant:
Mayes Emergency Services Trust Authority, 911 Trust Authority/911 Center Cherokee County, Board of County Commissioners of Cherokee County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Graff, et al v. Aberdeen Enterprizes, II, et al
as 21-5031
Defendant / Appellee:
RODNEY DERRYBERRY, Sheriff of LeFlore County, ABERDEEN ENTERPRIZES, II, INC., ADAM WOODRUFF, Sheriff of Latimer County and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
IRA LEE WILKINS, LINDA MEACHUM, DAVID SMITH and others
Defendant:
P.D. TAYLOR, Sheriff of Oklahoma County
Ortberg v. Groves et al
as 5:2019cv03219
Defendant:
David Groves, Advanced Correctional Healthcare and Cherokee County Sheriff's Office
Plaintiff:
Harvey Raymond Ortberg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfuetze v. Workforce Alliance of South Central Kansas et al
as 6:2019cv01112
Defendant:
Edward G. Naasz, Cherokee, County of, Tonya Reed and others
Plaintiff:
John Pfuetze
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cope v. Cherokee County Sheriff's Department et al
as 5:2017cv03187
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gene Cope, III
Defendant:
Cherokee County Sheriff's Department, Cherokee County Jail and Cherokee County, Kansas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clifton v. Alford et al
as 5:2011cv01353
Plaintiff:
Robert Nelson Clifton
Defendant:
Thomas H Alford, Larry Moore, Oklahoma State of and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Pfuetze v. State of Kansas, et al
as 10-3278
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROBERT PFUETZE
Defendant - Appellee:
STATE OF KANSAS, WORKFORCE ALLIANCE OF SOUTH CENTRAL KANSAS, MILDRED D. RICKS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
