Cases 1 - 10 of 96
Maldonado v. Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
as 2:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Frankie Maldonado
Respondent:
Attorney General for the State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Maldonado v. Rios et al
as 2:2024cv00005
Plaintiff:
Frankie Maldonado
Defendant:
FNU Rios and FNU Pascal
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Winterhalter v. Nunn
as 22-6054
Petitioner / Appellant:
FRANKIE DEAN WINTERHALTER
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT NUNN
Tipton v. Romulus, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00239
Plaintiff:
Frankie Tipton
Defendant:
Romulus, Inc. d/b/a Romulus Restaurant Group, Lotharlo, LLC and Romulus, Inc. doing business as Romulus Restaurant Group
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Winterhalter v. Nunn
as 5:2021cv01193
Petitioner:
Frankie Dean Winterhalter
Respondent:
Scott Nunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martinez et al v. Sequoyah County Criminal Justice Authority et al
as 6:2021cv00084
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Sequoyah County, Oklahoma, Turn Key Health Clinics, LLC, Julie Ninal and others
Plaintiff:
Francisca N. Martinez, Frankie Sawney, Angelo Sawney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mayfield v. Kidd et al
as 5:2020cv01246
Plaintiff:
Frankie Tiana Mayfield
Defendant:
Shawn James Kidd and Ace Air Conditioning Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Cherokee Nation, The et al v. Bunch et al
as 4:2020cv00596
Defendant:
Joe Bunch, Eddie Sacks, Jeannie Tidwell and others
Plaintiff:
Cherokee Nation, The and Cherokee Nation Businesses, LLC
Cause Of Action: 25 U.S.C. § 640
Dicks v. Gold Wynn Red River LLC
as 4:2020cv00429
Plaintiff:
Frankie Dicks
Defendant:
Gold Wynn Red River LLC doing business as Red River Apartments
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Ortiz v. No Named Respondents
as 1:2020cv00931
Respondent:
No Named Respondents
Petitioner:
Frankie Lynn Ortiz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
