Cases 1 - 10 of 527
Jones v. Day et al
as 6:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Paul Allen Jones
Defendant:
Jeremy Day and Trisha Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duffy v. Wyoming Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv00092
Defendant:
Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, GEO Services Director, Wyoming Department of Corrections and others
Plaintiff:
Shawn P Duffy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Edward v. McIntosh County, et al.
as 6:2024cv00097
Plaintiff:
Frank Edward, Jr.
Defendant:
McIntosh County, et al.,, Kevin Ledbetter, Monica Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-1083
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hughes v. Western Governors University
as 4:2024cv00193
Plaintiff:
Tiernan Hughes
Defendant:
Western Governors University
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Jackson v. Baker Hughes Inc.
as 1:2024cv00183
Plaintiff:
James R. Jackson
Defendant:
Baker Hughes Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Hughes v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2024cv00062
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Hughes
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Hughes (ID 105577) v. McClain
as 5:2024cv03054
Plaintiff:
Dashawn M. Hughes
Defendant:
Christopher McClain
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes et al v. Safeco Insurance Company of America
as 5:2024cv00302
Plaintiff:
Vearl Hughes and Carolyn Hughes
Defendant:
Safeco Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Wrenn v. Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General et al
as 5:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Darrick Edward Wrenn
Defendant:
Oklahoma Office of the Attorney General, Scott Pruitt, Mike Hunter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
