Cases 1 - 10 of 18
United Capital Management of Kansas, et al v. Nelson
as 23-3005
Plaintiff:
UNITED CAPITAL MANAGEMENT OF KANSAS, INC. and CHAD M. KOEHN
Counter Claimant:
MICHAEL E. NELSON
Pena v. Board of County Commissioners of Cibola County et al
as 1:2022cv00516
Plaintiff:
Monique Pena
Defendant:
Board of County Commissioners of Cibola County, CoreCivic, Inc., Brian Koehn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
United Capital Management of Kansas, Inc. et al v. Nelson
as 5:2022cv04008
Plaintiff:
United Capital Management of Kansas, Inc. and Chad M. Koehn
Defendant:
Michael E. Nelson
Counter Defendant:
John and Jane Does 1-15, Doe Corporations 1-15, John and Jane Does 1-25 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal Libel,Assault,Slander
Koehn v. Williams et al
as 1:2022cv00159
Plaintiff:
Joseph A. Koehn
Defendant:
Williams, Cassidy, Lillard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Camacho v. State of Kansas et al
as 5:2021cv03220
Plaintiff:
Mario L. Camacho
Defendant:
State of Kansas, Kansas Department of Corrections, Russell W. Hasenbank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Romero v. Core Civic, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv00544
Defendant:
Core Civic, Inc., No. 2 John Doe, Core Civic of Tennessee, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Ruben Romero
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. Koehn
as 21-5018
Defendant / Appellant:
KRISTINA JEAN KOEHN
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The v. Koehn et al
as 6:2019cv01071
Defendant:
Tessa A. Koehn and Mary P. Devers
Plaintiff:
Prudential Insurance Company of America, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Koehn v. USA
as 4:2019cv00094
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Kristina Jean Koehn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00583
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
