Cases 1 - 10 of 17
Shook v. Williams
as 5:2024cv00489
Petitioner:
Michael Sean Shook
Respondent:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long et al v. Harrison
as 4:2024cv00165
Petitioner:
Richard W Long, Richard William Long and Sheryl D Dorman
Respondent:
Sharon Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Straughen et al v. Dalbo, Inc
as 1:2021cv02230
Plaintiff:
Steven Straughen, Richard Williams and Ashley Straughen
Defendant:
Dalbo, Inc doing business as DHI Energy Service and BHS, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peterson v. Williams, et al
as 20-4059
Defendant / Appellee:
RICHARD WILLIAMS, in his individual and official capacities, DIXIE STATE UNIVERSITY, a public collect of the State of Utah; JOHN DOES I-X, in their individual and official capacities; ROE ENTITIES I-X, LYNN JOSEPH, in her individual and official capacities and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KEN PETERSON, an individual
Peterson v. Williams et al
as 4:2019cv00062
Defendant:
Richard Williams, Dixie State University, Lynn Joseph and others
Plaintiff:
Ken Peterson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Progressive Northern Insurance Company
as 6:2018cv00365
Plaintiff:
Richard Williams
Defendant:
Progressive Northern Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stawsky v. Williams et al
as 1:2017cv00130
Plaintiff:
Gregory L. Stawsky
Defendant:
Richard Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davenport v. Williams et al
as 2:2017cv00015
Plaintiff:
Varlo Davenport
Defendant:
Richard Williams , Mark Houser , Don Reid and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2016cv00830
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
United States v. William
as 16-1275
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
RICHARD WILLIAMS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
