Cases 1 - 10 of 38
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 6:2024cv00146
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota v. Clark
as 2:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Tri-State Insurance Company of Minnesota
Defendant:
Scotty Lee Clark
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Property Damage
Frederick v. Warden et al
as 1:2022cv03059
Petitioner:
Scotty Wayne Frederick
Respondent:
Warden and Executive Director
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McCalister v. Owens et al
as 4:2022cv00419
Plaintiff:
Michael Leon McCalister
Defendant:
Scotty Owens, John Copeland, James Pendelgraft and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Fuller v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma et al
as 6:2022cv00106
Plaintiff:
Scotty J. Fuller
Defendant:
Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Oklahoma and Health Care Service Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Cummins v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 1:2021cv01057
Defendant:
Andrew Saul and Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Scotty Cummins
3Rd Party Defendant:
SSA Noticing
Interested Party:
USAO-SS-Noticing
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brooks-Gage v. Martin
as 21-7008
Respondent / Appellee:
JIMMY MARTIN
Petitioner / Appellant:
SCOTTY LADELL BROOKS-GAGE
Roberts v. Oil Capital Electric LLC
as 5:2021cv00019
Plaintiff:
Scotty Roberts
Defendant:
Oil Capital Electric LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hammer v. Social Security Administration
as 6:2020cv00342
Plaintiff:
Scotty Hammer
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Brooks-Gage v. Crow
as 6:2019cv00347
Petitioner:
Scotty Ladell Brooks-Gage and Scotty Ladell Gage-Books
Respondent:
Oklahoma, State of and Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
