Cases 1 - 10 of 168
Drake v. City of Grove, Oklahoma et al
as 4:2023cv00521
Plaintiff:
Jerry Drake
Defendant:
City of Grove, Oklahoma, Daniel Amendolara and Terry Graham
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dill et al v. Thomas et al
as 5:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Teresa Denise Dill, Tarrah Layne Woods, Shannon Michelle Longman and others
Defendant:
FNU Thomas, FNU Hansen, FNU Shumack and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States v. Drakes
as 23-3152
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
JAHBOU RUDOLPH DRAKES
Dunn v. Kansas, State of et al
as 5:2023cv03199
Petitioner:
Drake A. Dunn
Respondent:
Kansas, State of and Eric Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Drake v. Castillo Gaytan et al
as 2:2023cv00536
Plaintiff:
John Drake
Defendant:
Rodolfo Castillo Gaytan, Kurry Jensen Transport LLC and Kurry B Jensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Webb v. Drake
as 5:2023cv00673
Plaintiff:
Michael Webb
Defendant:
FNU Drake
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Drake v. Amerisure Partners Insurance Company
as 1:2023cv01916
Plaintiff:
M Alexander Drake
Defendant:
Amerisure Partners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
GS Holistic, LLC v. Smokey Monkey 4 LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01846
Plaintiff:
GS Holistic, LLC
Defendant:
Smokey Monkey 4 LLC doing business as Smokey Monkey Drake and Nassim Kchik
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Varnell v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00245
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Jerry Drake Varnell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentence
Drake v. Burtlow et al
as 1:2023cv00266
Plaintiff:
Adam J. Drake
Defendant:
Siobahn Burtlow, David Bergman, Casey Warner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
