Cases 51 - 60 of 7,817
Moore v. Sellers (INMATE 3)
as 2:2024cv00238
Plaintiff:
Marvin Moore
Defendant:
Carl Brandon Sellers, III
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Orso v. Jackson
as 1:2024cv00124
Plaintiff:
Ricky A. Orso, Jr.
Defendant:
Heath Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hill v. Brown et al (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00239
Plaintiff:
Quincy Tyrone Hill
Defendant:
Nona Adam Brown, Joseph Angelo, Paul Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Savannah (INMATE 3)
as 1:2024cv00240
Plaintiff:
Charles Edward Brown
Defendant:
Jail Supervisor Savannah
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
Steven Keith Jones
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections and Chevelle K Hunte
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Price v. Slager
as 5:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Timothy Theotis Price
Defendant:
James Slager
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ferguson v. Gaines et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Willie Howard Ferguson
Defendant:
Officer Raymond Lewis Gaines, Officer Quincy Jones, Warden Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shelnutt v. McLaughlin et al
as 5:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
Keneth Kaylon Shelnutt
Defendant:
Josh McLaughlin, Brady Aderholt, Gray West and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Pipes et al
as 1:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Raymond Shane Greene
Defendant:
Wesley S. Pipes, Mary B. Windom, Mark S. Tunstall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Somerville v. Limestone County Sheriffs Department et al
as 5:2024cv00220
Plaintiff:
Fred Somerville
Defendant:
Limestone County Sheriffs Department, Mike Blakely and Joey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
