Cases 11 - 20 of 86
Jones et al v. Ivey et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00929
Plaintiff:
Tavores Kasel Montgomery, Treundous Qwavon Davis, Dameon Tunnell Stewart and others
Defendant:
Jennifer Anderson King, Sharon Folks, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Petitioner:
Liston Maron Richardson, George Lee Thompson, III, Steven Christopher Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch v. Sprayberry
as 4:2019cv00247
Plaintiff:
Gary Couch
Defendant:
Kevin Sprayberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch et al v. Illa
as 4:2019cv00191
Plaintiff:
Gary Couch and Harley Williams
Defendant:
Illa
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 2:2019cv00100
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, Stephanie Mercer and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Couch et al v. Sprayberry
as 1:2019cv03657
Plaintiff:
Gary Couch and Harley Williams
Defendant:
Kevin Sprayberry
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL et al
as 3:2019cv00073
Defendant:
TODD, DR PAUL BUCZYNSKY, OGLETHORPE COUNTY JAIL MEDICAL STAFF and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. CONYERS et al
as 4:2019cv00283
Plaintiff:
JEFFERY E COUCH, II
Defendant:
J CONYERS and A R MOCK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FULLER et al v. OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS et al
as 3:2019cv01697
Defendant:
OKALOOSA COUNTY BOARD OF COMMISSIONERS, CORIZON HEALTH, EDMONDS and others
Plaintiff:
RYAN THOMAS, COREY SMITH, BRIAN CASEY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Curry v. Couch et al
as 2:2019cv00113
Plaintiff:
Eddie Curry
Defendant:
Gerald Couch and Dr. Linwood Zollar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
COUCH v. APPLING ITF et al
as 5:2019cv00209
Defendant:
COUNSELOR DEBRA CLARY, SAWS, LEAD NURSE STEPHANIE MERCER and others
Plaintiff:
JEFFREY HOYT COUCH
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
