Cases 11 - 20 of 759
Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Putnam)
as 3:2024cv00281
Petitioner:
Raymond Claudio
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Raymond Claudio v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 24-10686
Petitioner:
RAYMOND CLAUDIO
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Gill v. Broton et al
as 5:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Raymond Edward Gill
Defendant:
Warden Jennifer A. Broton, Assistant Warden Avery, B. Pavigliqnti and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Ferguson v. Gaines et al
as 2:2024cv00251
Plaintiff:
Willie Howard Ferguson
Defendant:
Officer Raymond Lewis Gaines, Officer Quincy Jones, Warden Gwendolyn Givens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Patrick v. Paulding County State Court
as 4:2024cv00048
Petitioner:
Raymond Dushawn Patrick
Respondent:
Paulding County State Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Owen v. Moody
as 3:2024cv00181
Petitioner:
Raymond Owen, Jr.
Respondent:
Ashley Moody
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Keeton v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 3)
as 3:2024cv00082
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritter v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ritter, Raymond Mitchell Keeton, Courtney Morgan and others
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Raymond Strong v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 24-10320
Petitioner:
RAYMOND L. STRONG
Respondent:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Keeton v. Maddox (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00027
Plaintiff:
Raymond Mitchell Keeton
Defendant:
Andrew L. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
