Prisoner Petitions Cases filed in the Eleventh Circuit Courts
Cases 21 - 30 of 115
Guest v. Rutledge State Prison We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2020cv00069
Defendant: Rutledge State Prison
Plaintiff: Jason Randall Guest
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Butler et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2020cv00662
Defendant: Jefferson S. Dunn, Reosha Butler and Kay Ivey
Plaintiff: Roy Murphy Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Serratt v. Butler et al (INMATE 1) We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2020cv00625
Plaintiff: Bobby Gene Smith, Jr., Jonathan Yancy, Roy Murphy Rutledge and others
Defendant: Warden Butler, Kay Ivey, Jefferson S. Dunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rutledge v. Reeves et al
as 3:2020cv00121
Defendant: Marty Reeves, Troup County Sheriff Dept., LaGrange Police Dept. and others
Plaintiff: Markeith Anton Rutledge
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dorsey v. Dorsey et al
as 2:2020cv00124
Defendant: Police Officer Donna Sims, Police Officer R. Rutledge, Probation Officer Richard Herrera and others
Plaintiff: Julius Scott Dorsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JONES v. GEORGIA et al
as 4:2020cv00022
Defendant: WITAKER, COLLINS, RUTLEDGE STATE PRISON and others
Plaintiff: JAMES DEON JONES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. Toney et al
as 4:2019cv00589
Defendant: John Hutton, Finch, Charles Monk and others
Plaintiff: Vernon Kendrick George
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dansby v. Alabama, State of et al
as 7:2018cv01846
Defendant: Edwards, Alabama, State of, Bell and others
Plaintiff: Eric Kevin Dansby
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
RUTLEDGE v. MCLAUGHLIN et al
as 5:2018cv00303
Respondent: WARDEN GREGORY MCLAUGHLIN and STATE OF GEORGIA
Petitioner: BOBBY RUTLEDGE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Derrick Milner v. Rutledge SP Warden
as 18-12677
Petitioner - Appellant: DERRICK MILNER
Respondent - Appellee: RUTLEDGE SP WARDEN

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?