Cases 31 - 40 of 43
Jason Monk v. Floyd
as 14-13936
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JASON CHARLES MONK
Defendant - Appellee:
FLOYD
MONK v. FLOYD et al
as 7:2013cv00114
Plaintiff:
JASON CHARLES MONK
Defendant:
FLOYD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cathey v. Curry et al
as 2:2012cv04115
Plaintiff:
Daveon Lamarnce Cathey
Defendant:
Chris Curry, Monk, Patrick Eugene and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Montgomery v. Alabama Department of Corrections et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2011cv00757
Plaintiff:
Marshall Montgomery
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections, Kim Tobias Thomas, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ramey v. Specks et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Abraham Ramey
Defendant:
Cedrick Specks, Sgt. MacMillian, Steve Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bagley v. State of Alabama et al
as 5:2010cv00961
Plaintiff:
James Edward Bagley
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Circuit Court of Calhoun County, Alabama and Samuel Monk, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frazier v. Shelby County Corrections Facility et al
as 2:2010cv00276
Plaintiff:
Laron Frazier
Defendant:
Shelby County Corrections Facility, Parker, Pearce and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Santos v. Flemmings et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00787
Plaintiff:
Nedolandez Leon Santos
Defendant:
Danny Flemmings, J. C. Giles and M. Larry Monk
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Hill et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00709
Plaintiff:
Eddie Ahmad Hayes
Defendant:
S. Hill, Sgt. Parker, J. C. Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Serratt v. Giles et al
as 6:2009cv01145
Petitioner:
Girlis Hugh Serratt
Respondent:
Giles, Monk and The Attorney General of the State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
