Cases 51 - 60 of 64
Williams v. The State of Georgia et al
as 4:2010cv00147
Petitioner:
Carl Nathaniel Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Georgia, Jeff Hendrix and Charles Guyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st
Hendrix v. Giles et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2010cv00454
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
J. C. Giles and Lt. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. The State of Georgia et al
as 1:2010cv01254
Petitioner:
Carl Nathaniel Williams, Jr.
Respondent:
The State of Georgia, Jeff Hendrix and Charles Guyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Hendrix v. Giles et al (INMATE1)
as 2:2010cv00183
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Wayne Hendrix
Defendant:
J. C. Giles, CO Lowery, CO Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. State Of Georgia et al
as 4:2010cv00042
Defendant:
State Of Georgia, Jeff Hendrix and Charles Guyer
Plaintiff:
Carl Nathaniel Williams, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis v. VanDyck et al
as 1:2009cv00928
Plaintiff:
Gary DeWayne Mullis
Defendant:
B. J. VanDyck, Charles Ray Scott, David R. Yood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis v. VanDyck et al
as 1:2009cv00927
Plaintiff:
Gary DeWayne Mullis
Defendant:
B. J. VanDyck, Charles Ray Scott, David R. Yood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hendrix v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 6:2009cv00546
Petitioner:
Larry Hendrix
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hendrix v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2009cv00070
Petitioner:
Larry Hendrix
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
NIEBLA v. HENDRIX et al
as 5:2008cv00328
Plaintiff:
JORGE L NIEBLA
Defendant:
HENDRIX, JOHN M PALMER and WENDALL WHITEHURST
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
