Cases 1 - 10 of 182
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carter v. Barrs
as 4:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
Gary Anthony Carter, Jr.
Defendant:
Captain Brian Barrs
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Gates, Jr. v. Lee County, et al
as 23-10353
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAM A. GATES, JR.
Defendant / Appellee:
LEE COUNTY, LEE COUNTY COURTHOUSE, LEE COUNTY JAIL and others
BRETT v. BIDEN, et al
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, JILL BIDEN, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Frilando v. Barr et al
as 4:2022cv00207
Plaintiff:
John Anthony Frilando
Defendant:
Karen Dove Barr, James Bass, Jr., Tammie Mosley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gates v. Scowden et al
as 2:2022cv00538
Plaintiff:
William A. Gates, Jr.
Defendant:
C. Scowden, C. Redford, K. Tisdale and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Delancy v. Barr et al
as 3:2022cv00034
Petitioner:
Stanekio Delancy
Respondent:
William P. Barr, Chad Wolf, Michael Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ryles v. Taylor et al (INMATE 2)
as 3:2021cv00589
Plaintiff:
Sanford Leonard Ryles
Defendant:
Heath Taylor, Mike Loyless, Steve Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
