Cases 1 - 10 of 25
BRAZILL v. BRANNON et al
as 5:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL R BRAZILL
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER R BRANNON, JONATHAN JONES, GLENN E HANCOCK and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Williams et al
as 3:2023cv00098
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
R. Williams, J. Taylor, R. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clark v. Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2022cv04201
Plaintiff:
Joe Nathan Clark
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Sheriff's Department, Sgt. Crutchfield, Deputy Gracia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chandler v. Converse et al
as 1:2022cv03359
Plaintiff:
Jakale Errion Chandler
Defendant:
Converse, Crutchfield, Kebo Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carson v. Gwinnett County Jail et al
as 1:2021cv04148
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Carson
Defendant:
Gwinnett County Jail, Sergeant Crutchfield and Officer Weathers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CONCEPCION-PADILLA v. MAY et al
as 5:2021cv00167
Plaintiff:
RICARDO CONCEPCION-PADILLA
Defendant:
WARDEN, SCOTT MAY, SHULA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas v. Correct Health Bartow, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv00125
Defendant:
Shalisha Fisher, Clark Millsap, George Noland and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Harold Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EICHELBERGER v. REYNOLDS et al
as 5:2019cv00024
Defendant:
E D WATS, CRUTCHFIELD, MORENO and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LEE EICHELBERGER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HERNANDEZ v. CRUTCHFIELD
as 5:2018cv00167
Defendant:
S CRUTCHFIELD, J GREEN, WARDEN MADDOX and others
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO F HERNANDEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
