Cases 1 - 10 of 64
Elijah Bankston v. State of Florida
as 0:2023cv62232
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee and Elijah Bankston
Defendant:
State of Florida
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Waldrip v. Warden
as 1:2023cv05140
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Waldrip
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McKinnon v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2022cv00093
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee McKinnon
Defendant:
Jeffery Baldwin, Steven T. Marshall and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Little v. Banks et al
as 5:2021cv00984
Plaintiff:
Tommy Lee Little
Defendant:
Banks and Carter
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. State of Alabama
as 1:2021cv00023
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Petitioner:
Tommie Lee Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jones v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Polk County)
as 8:2020cv02357
Petitioner:
Tommy Lee Jones
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Jones
as 1:2019cv00957
Respondent:
Daniel Hudson, Karla Jones, Tommy Lee Purdue and others
Petitioner:
Daniel MacAuther Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Wilson v. Stonkoski et al
as 1:2019cv00956
Defendant:
Clark Stankoski, Tommy Lee Perdue and Daniel Hudson
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacAuther Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. United States of America
as 3:2019cv00629
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Tommie Lee Jackson, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Tommy Gaines v. Attorney General, State of Fl., et al
as 18-11732
Petitioner - Appellant:
TOMMY LEE GAINES
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA, SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and FLORIDA COMMISSION ON OFFENDER REVIEW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
