Cases 1 - 10 of 114
Plunkett v. Ward et al
as 5:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Stephen Christopher Plunkett
Defendant:
TIMOTHY C WARD, Damon Henninger, William Danforth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BRETT v. BIDEN, et al
as 1:2022cv00221
Plaintiff:
FRANK BRETT
Defendant:
JOE BIDEN, JILL BIDEN, WILLIAM BARR and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Violation 5th & 8th Amendme
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv01186
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Y. Cargill
Defendant:
United States of America, Joseph Biden, Kamala Harris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crutchfield v. Fleiner et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00515
Plaintiff:
Barney Crutchfield
Defendant:
Stacey Fleiner, D. Taylor, Kalvin Calhoun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gromov v. Barr et al
as 3:2021cv00670
Petitioner:
Kirill Sergeycvich Gromov
Respondent:
William Barr, Chad Wolf, Michael Meade and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00405
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, A W E. Villareal, David Brewer and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Calhoun et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00364
Defendant:
Bureau of Prisons, Sonya Thompson, CMC Barnes and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Cargill v. United States of America et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2021cv00240
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, United States District Court, United States of America and others
Plaintiff:
Quincetta Cargill and Quincetta Y. Cargill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Effs v. Barr et al
as 2:2021cv00103
Petitioner:
Leslie Effs
Respondent:
Attorney General William Barr and John Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
BESS v. U.S.Atty General et al
as 1:2021cv20331
Plaintiff:
Danroy Bess
Defendant:
John Kelly, WILLIAM BARR, U.S. Attorney General and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
