Cases 1 - 10 of 1,537
White v. United States of America
as 3:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
Johnny Deangelo White
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Williams v. Lawson et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00336
Plaintiff:
Arthur Williams
Defendant:
Angela Lawson, Megan Fulghum, Valicia White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Tabil
as 2:2024cv00529
Plaintiff:
James Patrick White
Defendant:
Sargeant Tabil
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. NEEL et al
as 3:2024cv00246
Plaintiff:
SHAQUON R JOHNSON
Defendant:
J NEEL, E MANNERS, S GREENE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr Complaint for mandamus relief (prisoner)
Bond v. United States of America et al
as 5:2024cv00273
Plaintiff:
Erving N Bond, Jr
Defendant:
United States of America and FNU White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Wihly Harpo-Brown v. FCI Coleman Low Warden, et al
as 24-11694
Plaintiff:
WIHLY HARPO-BROWN
Defendant:
FCI COLEMAN LOW WARDEN, JOHN DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations, JANE DOE, Assistant Warden, Coleman Low, Inmate Affairs and Operations and others
MURZIKE v. SPEARS et al
as 3:2024cv00228
Plaintiff:
JAMES T MURZIKE
Defendant:
S SPEARS, GODDARD, MCMATH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MURZIKE v. GIELOW et al
as 3:2024cv00221
Plaintiff:
JAMES T. MURZIKE
Defendant:
W GIELOW, K PERKINS, J STREIT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ramey v. White County Sheriffs Department
as 2:2024cv00106
Plaintiff:
Danny Dewayne Ramey
Defendant:
White County Sheriffs Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
