Cases 121 - 130 of 3,650
Thompson v. Administrator White et al
as 6:2023cv00955
Petitioner:
Danny Thompson
Respondent:
Administrator White and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Spears v. State of Alabama et al
as 6:2023cv00949
Petitioner:
Darrell J Spears
Respondent:
State of Alabama and Administrator White
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McQueen v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Marcus McQueen
Defendant:
State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. Buckner et al (MAG+)
as 3:2023cv00431
Plaintiff:
Megan E. Dawson
Defendant:
Nancy Buckner, Allison Bryars, Stephanie Glispee and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Taylor v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 3)
as 2:2023cv00425
Plaintiff:
Johnny Ray Taylor, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Alabama and Officer Underwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Edward Barber v. Governor of the State of Alabama, et al
as 23-12242
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES EDWARD BARBER
Defendant / Appellee:
GOVERNOR OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA, COMMISSIONER, ALABAMA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, HOLMAN CF WARDEN and others
Odom-Davis v. State Of Alabama
as 1:2023cv00257
Petitioner:
Eric Vernardo Odom-Davis
Respondent:
State Of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gould v. Alabama, State of
as 2:2023cv00860
Petitioner:
Roland Andra Gould
Respondent:
Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The and Alabama, State of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hector Alvarez v. Warden, et al
as 23-12165
Petitioner / Appellant:
HECTOR ALVAREZ
Respondent / Appellee:
WARDEN and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
In re: Corey Heard
as 23-12186
Petitioner:
In re: COREY BERNARD HEARD
Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF ALABAMA
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
