Cases 141 - 150 of 829,705
Algarin v. FMA Alliance, LTD
as 1:2024cv00645
Plaintiff:
Carmelo Algarin
Defendant:
FMA Alliance, LTD and FMA Alliance, LTD.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Gantt v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02221
Plaintiff:
Juanita Gantt
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK NORTH AMERICA OPERATIONS A/S, NOVO NORDISK US HOLDINGS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Kirkland v. Novo Nordisk A/S et al
as 2:2024cv02240
Plaintiff:
Dwinette Kirkland
Defendant:
NOVO NORDISK A/S, NOVO NORDISK INC., Novo Nordisk America Operations A/S and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Trinh v. Tran
as 4:2024cv02113
Plaintiff:
Van Thi-Hanh Trinh
Defendant:
Minh-Tam Tammy Tran
Cause Of Action: 88 U.S.C. § 8888 Other Statutory Actions
Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, PLLC v. Meneses Law Firm PLLC et al
as 4:2024cv02190
Plaintiff:
Alexandra Lozano Immigration Law, PLLC
Defendant:
Meneses Law Firm PLLC and Juan Pablo Diaz Cuenca
LIQIN v. USA
as 1:2024cv00871
Plaintiff:
JIN LIQIN
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1491 Tucker Act
Hawes v. Angol
as 3:2024cv00124
Petitioner:
Robert Dennis Hawes
Respondent:
S. Angol
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State Pre-Trial)
Build Group, Inc. v. Indian Harbor Insurance Company
as 3:2024cv03426
Plaintiff:
Build Group, Inc.
Defendant:
Indian Harbor Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
B.S. v. Uber Technologies Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03443
Plaintiff:
B. S.
Defendant:
Uber Technologies, Inc., Rasier, LLC and Rasier-CA, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Shattuck v. SAS Institute Inc. et al
as 3:2024cv03424
Plaintiff:
Steven Shattuck
Defendant:
SAS Institute Inc., Ideas, Inc., Choice Hotels International, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15 Antitrust Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
