Cases 161 - 170 of 467
Cangiolosi et al v. United States Postal Service et al
as 2:2020cv00308
Plaintiff:
Laura Ann Cangiolosi, Brian David Farnell and Laura Ann Jackson
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, John Doe, Norma Ibarra and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv00183
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Gleaton v. Cacciatore et al
as 1:2020cv04938
Defendant:
John Cacciatore, United States Postal Service and Dyrick Fowler
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gleaton, Sr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gleaton v. Snow et al
as 1:2020cv04937
Plaintiff:
Bobby Gleaton, Sr.
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, Lionel Snow, Dyrick Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Advance Business Capital LLC v. United States Postal Service
as 9:2020cv82216
Plaintiff:
Advance Business Capital LLC doing business as Triumph Business Capital
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 39 U.S.C. § 409
ROBERTS v. ADAMS et al
as 5:2020cv00450
Defendant:
JUDGE G.E. "BO" ADAMS, ROBINS FINANCIAL CREDIT UNION, ATLANTA POSTAL CREDIT UNION and others
Plaintiff:
STACEY HASLEM ROBERTS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
National Labor Relations Board v. United States Postal Service
as 20-14155
Petitioner:
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES POSTAL SERVICE
Nainani et al v. United States Postal Service
as 1:2020cv24402
Plaintiff:
Michelle M Nainani and Sonia M Nainani
Defendant:
United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Arafat v. United States Postal Service, USPS
as 0:2020cv62164
Plaintiff:
Nasra M. Arafat (Ibrahim)
Defendant:
United States Postal Service, USPS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00274
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
