Cases 11 - 20 of 1,318
Foster v. Patchett et al (MAG+)
as 1:2024cv00128
Plaintiff:
Ronald H. Foster
Defendant:
Drew Patchett, Kali Hyatt, Southeast Dental Work LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Carter v. Headley et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00120
Plaintiff:
Thomas Ray Carter
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley and The State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Davis v. Headley (INMATE 2)
as 2:2024cv00108
Plaintiff:
Glennie Dee Davis
Defendant:
Joseph H. Headley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
M. et al v. Azar et al
as 2:2024cv00102
Plaintiff:
Michaela M., Gabriel M., Kinley G. and others
Defendant:
Stephanie M. Azar and Jean W. Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
H. v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 4)
as 3:2024cv00089
Plaintiff:
Andres DeMendoza H.
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ritter v. Lee County Detention Center (INMATE 1)
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Brian Henry Ritter, Raymond Mitchell Keeton, Courtney Morgan and others
Defendant:
Lee County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Odom v. Baldwin et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00051
Plaintiff:
Eric Vernardo Odom
Defendant:
Ben H. Brooks and Jeffery Baldwin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Smith v. United States of America (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00745
Plaintiff:
Richard H. Smith
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
