Cases 11 - 20 of 47
Caplan v. SANDIA & SEGNINI, LLC et al
as 9:2018cv80992
Defendant:
SANDIA & SEGNINI, LLC and B. J. AND ME, INC.
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Allen Penoyer v. James Russell, et al
as 18-12184
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALLEN L. PENOYER
Defendant - Appellee:
JAMES T. RUSSELL, Prosecuter, B. J. DRIVER, Circuit Judge, JOSEPH DONAHEY, Attorney and others
Penoyer v. Russell et al
as 8:2018cv01008
Plaintiff:
Allen Lloyd Penoyer
Defendant:
James T. Russell, B. J. Driver, Joseph Donahey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BistroMD, LLC v. Scott Logistics Corp. et al
as 2:2017cv00088
Plaintiff:
BistroMD, LLC
Defendant:
Scott Logistics Corp. and B&J Trucking Service, Inc.
Cross_claimant:
Scott Logistics Corp.
Cross_defendant:
B&J Trucking Service, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14705
Smith v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 3:2016cv01451
Plaintiff:
Andre Smith
Defendant:
Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, J. D. Kent, A. S. Napir and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Elmore County Sheriff's Department (INMATE 1)
as 2:2015cv00510
Plaintiff:
Jerry Lane Walker, Jr.
Defendant:
B J Wilson, Bill Franklin and Deputy Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Amador v. B&J Construction Service Corp et al
as 1:2015cv21252
Plaintiff:
Berman Ulises Treminio Amador
Defendant:
B&J Construction Service Corp and Beatriz Velazquez Granado
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01010
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00640
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Harris v. Irvine et al
as 1:2014cv00177
Plaintiff:
Anita Harris
Defendant:
B. J. Irvine , D. A. Genaro and Gwinnett County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1443
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
