Cases 11 - 20 of 1,277
Boyatt v. Clay to Custom Construction, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00074
Plaintiff:
Anthony Boyatt doing business as Boyatt Design
Defendant:
Clay to Custom Construction, LLC, Arnold Clay Sindledecker and Cody Devin Nutt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Copyright Infringement
HUMANITARIAN v. LEARY et al
as 7:2024cv00032
Plaintiff:
HUMANITARIAN, Larry L. Thomas Jr and LARRY L THOMAS JR
Defendant:
PETER D LEARY, STEPHEN LYNN, PETER KO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Crockett v. Carnival Corporation
as 1:2024cv21185
Plaintiff:
Clay Crockett
Defendant:
Carnival Corporation doing business as Carnival Cruise Line
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Dustin v. Palmer et al
as 3:2024cv00316
Plaintiff:
Danny Richard Dustin
Defendant:
Charity Palmer, Ashley Terry, Melissa Nelson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rawlins v. Estes et al
as 2:2024cv00329
Plaintiff:
Robert Clay Rawlins
Defendant:
David Crowder Estes and Jennings Farm Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Crawford v. Ladnier et al (MAG+)
as 2:2024cv00167
Plaintiff:
Martin Crawford
Defendant:
Darrell Ladnier, Shelton Hamilton, Walter Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
OSBORNE v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00104
Plaintiff:
ALAN OSBORNE
Defendant:
CLAYTON ADKINSON, WILLIAM MCCORMICK and CLAY ADKINSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
MATACCHIERO v. MCCORMICK
as 3:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
DAN MATACCHIERO
Defendant:
CLAY ADKINSON and WILLIAM MCCORMICK
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
