Cases 11 - 20 of 431
Council et al v. Ivey et al
as 2:2023cv00712
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Council, Kinetik Justice, Lee Edward Moore, Jr. and others
Defendant:
Kay Ivey, Steve Marshall, Leigh Gwathney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 0:2023cv62309
Plaintiff:
Tommy Yesbick
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
REDDING v. ENGLISH et al
as 3:2023cv24741
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL REDDING
Defendant:
GARY ENGLISH, R BETHEA, JOHN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
JACKSON v. DOSEK et al
as 3:2023cv24733
Plaintiff:
CHARLIE JACKSON
Defendant:
DOSEK, MICHOT, GUNNS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YESBICK v. ENGLISH
as 3:2023cv24735
Petitioner:
TOMMY YESBICK
Respondent:
GARY ENGLISH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HINES v. JONES et al
as 4:2023cv00509
Plaintiff:
Robert Hines
Defendant:
Valerie Jones, Christopher Dille, Tyler Wimberly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PAULCIN v. DIXON et al
as 3:2023cv24711
Plaintiff:
PROPHET PAULCIN
Defendant:
RICKY DIXON, GEO, G ENGLISH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ENGLISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv31355
Plaintiff:
MIKE ENGLISH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ENGLISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv27119
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA ENGLISH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ENGLISH v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv24112
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL ENGLISH
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
