Cases 11 - 20 of 28
Hadcock v. JEST OPERATING, INC. et al
as 6:2020cv00399
Defendant:
MERIDETH NAGEL, P.A., JEST OPERATING, INC., MERIDETH C. NAGEL and others
Plaintiff:
Doris Hadcock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROGERS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13644
Defendant:
3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL J ROGERS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DEWITT v. FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 3:2019cv01990
Defendant:
J ROGERS, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, JACKIE FLOYD and others
Plaintiff:
TIMOTHY KENT DEWITT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hill v. Kirkland et al
as 3:2016cv00924
Plaintiff:
Lester W. Hill
Defendant:
Jeffrey L. Kirkland, Markus Jackson, Janet M. Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rogers v. City of College Park, Georgia et al
as 1:2016cv01556
Plaintiff:
Roderick J. Rogers
Defendant:
City of College Park, Georgia, Brian J. Ferguson, Gregory T. Silvers and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Baldwison et al
as 2:2014cv01413
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
J Baldwison, T Thomas, Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Rogers et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2014cv00676
Plaintiff:
James M. Broadhead
Defendant:
J. Rogers, Officer Scott, David Tytell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Calhoun et al
as 2:2014cv00634
Plaintiff:
James M Broadhead
Defendant:
Calhoun, Scott, Evelgor Dorsett and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadhead v. Scott et al
as 2:2014cv00597
Plaintiff:
James Broadhead
Defendant:
Scott, J Rogers, R Gaines and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
REEVES et al v. HURST et al
as 5:2013cv00196
Plaintiff:
JAMES A REEVES and DENISE Y REEVES
Defendant:
DEBRA K HURST, PAMELA J ROGERS and S FREEMAN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
