Cases 11 - 20 of 21
Clapp et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21441
Defendant:
Square Inc., Freetrade, Ltd., Trading 212 Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Sabrina Clapp and Denise Redfield
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0015
Ross et al v. Robinhood Financial, LLC et al
as 1:2021cv21338
Defendant:
ROBINHOOD SECURITIES LLC, Trading 212 LTD., Citadel Enterprise Americas, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Erika Mercado, C. Louis Bunya, Ryan Zachary Ross and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001
Cheng et al v. Ally Financial Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv21318
Defendant:
Square Inc., The Charles Schwab Corporation, Freetrade, Ltd. and others
Plaintiff:
Shane Cheng and Terell Sterling
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0001 Antitrust Litigation
Fortner-Hanson v. Door & Building Components, Incorporated et al
as 1:2020cv00904
Defendant:
Door & Building Components, Incorporated doing business as DBCI and M1 Support Services, L.P.
Plaintiff:
Judy Fortner-Hanson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Mycoskie, LLC v. 2019shoesonsale.com et al
as 0:2020cv61808
Defendant:
brandedshoesale.com, bdamrnews.com, m1-essen.de and others
Plaintiff:
Mycoskie, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00771
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2019cv81320
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00443
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00293
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
John Pavao v. Jenkins, et al
as 18-11203
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN PAVAO
Defendant - Appellee:
JENKINS, DANIEL LIONS, INMATE, SERGEANT, M1-DORM and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
