Cases 11 - 19 of 19
BROWN et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 4:2020cv00064
Plaintiff:
MALIA ELENA ARCIERO and RODERICK BROWN
Defendant:
U S DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS, SHANNON D WITHERS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peay v. The Virginian Condominium Association, Inc.
as 1:2018cv05581
Defendant:
Jane Ghegan, Thomas Ghegan, Malia Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Peay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peay v. The Virginian Condominium Association Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05583
Defendant:
Jane Ghegan, Thomas Ghegan, Malia Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Peay and The Virginian Condominium Association, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peay v. The Virginian Condominium Association, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv05582
Defendant:
Jane Ghegan, Thomas Ghegan, Malia Chang and others
Plaintiff:
Carol J. Peay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Walker v. Jones et al
as 3:2018cv00693
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Lee Walker
Defendant:
Julie Jones, Warden F. Fock, Major Boston and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alters et al v. Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., et al
as 1:2017cv23433
Plaintiff:
Brett Alters , April Rockstead Barker , Dave Battinieri and others
Defendant:
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., Volkswagen A.G., Takata Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Banks et al v. One Named Defense Counsel et al
as 6:2014cv00555
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks and Jadusingh
Defendant:
One Named Defense Counsel, United States Attorney, One Named AUSA and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2009cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Holtz v. Jimenez et al
as 1:2008cv22112
Plaintiff:
Abel Holtz and Abel Holtz
Defendant:
Agustin Malia Jimenez and Malter Consulter Corporativo, S.L.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
