Cases 11 - 20 of 92
Morgan v. Holland (INMATE 4)
as 2:2023cv00391
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Mrs. Holland
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morgan v. McCovery et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2023cv00386
Plaintiff:
Garon McKenzie Morgan
Defendant:
Larry McCovery, Christopher Gordy and Bryan Gavins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie v. Cleveland et al
as 2:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
Danita McKenzie
Defendant:
Thomas Cleveland, J Adams and C Wade
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01102
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003 Job Discrimination
Mosley v. Cunningham et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2022cv00499
Plaintiff:
Fredrick Bernard Mosley
Defendant:
Shirley Cunningham, Patrice Richie Jones, Alabama Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McKenzie et al v. Auction.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv00426
Plaintiff:
Martha McKenzie and Dan McKenzie
Defendant:
Auction.com, Inc., First American Data Tree, LLC and First American Financial Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
McKenzie v. Walgreen Co., Inc.
as 2:2022cv00399
Plaintiff:
Shequetha McKenzie
Defendant:
Walgreen Co., Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Davis v. Elmore County Jail et al
as 2:2022cv00348
Plaintiff:
Tonya Lynn Davis
Defendant:
Bill Franklin, Elmore County Jail, Mark K. McKenzie and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilson v. Mckenzie et al (INMATE 1)
as 5:2021cv01556
Plaintiff:
Daniel MacArthur Wilson
Defendant:
Captain Mckenzie, Officer Oden, Sgt. Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
George v. McKenzie et al
as 1:2021cv01340
Plaintiff:
Jason Taylor George
Defendant:
Sean Patrick McKenzie and United Parcel Service Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
