Cases 11 - 20 of 102
BARKER v. LAMB et al
as 1:2022cv00060
Plaintiff:
DEKELDRICK BARKER
Defendant:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEWIS LAMB, ADA TAMMY OWENS PEAVY, JUDGE JIMMIE BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brockington v. Rigdon et al
as 3:2022cv00014
Plaintiff:
Cameron Brockington
Defendant:
Randy Rigdon, Jeffrey Deal, Jordan Peavy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jacoby v. Dunn et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2021cv00843
Plaintiff:
Brent William Jacoby
Defendant:
Jefferson S. Dunn, Monica McCoy, Warden Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
OWEN v. SUMTER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE et al
as 1:2021cv00180
Plaintiff:
TONY MICHAEL OWEN
Defendant:
SUMTER COUNTY CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTE and TAMI PEAVY OWEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
PEAVY v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv67592
Plaintiff:
BRANDON PEAVY
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ROYAL v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv00319
Plaintiff:
PATRICIA PEAVY ROYAL
Defendant:
COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205
THOMPSON v. COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL et al
as 7:2021cv00110
Plaintiff:
CARL ASHLEY THOMPSON
Defendant:
COLQUITT COUNTY JAIL, Sheriff ROD HOWELL, Capt JULIUS COX and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
PEAVY JR v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv40816
Plaintiff:
WILLIE LEE PEAVY JR
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peavy v. Cuevas et al
as 2:2021cv14284
Plaintiff:
Mark Peavy
Defendant:
Benjamine Cuevas and Richard Sherman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Grover Peavy v. Secretary, FL DOC
as 21-10136
Petitioner / Appellant:
GROVER W. PEAVY
Plaintiff / Appellee:
MICHAEL GISI and WILLIAM DEMLER
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
