Cases 11 - 20 of 128
CASALI v. S&S CUSTOM EXHAUST AND AUTOMOTIVE REPAIR, LLC
as 3:2023cv01034
Plaintiff:
Daniel Casali
Defendant:
S&S Custom Exhaust and Automotive Repair, LLC
Rosenberg v. S&S Transportation & Logistics, Inc.
as 1:2023cv03361
Plaintiff:
Chad Rosenberg
Defendant:
S&S Transportation & Logistics, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 14705 Interstate Commerce Act/Carmack Amendment
SIMMONS v. KOLODZIEJ et al
as 3:2023cv20567
Plaintiff:
TAVORIS K SIMMONS
Defendant:
KOLODZIEJ, S S DOVE, SETTLEMIRES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
M.A., et al v. Florida State Board of Education, et al
as 23-10866
Plaintiff / Appellant:
M.A., S S, RABBI AMY MORRISON and others
Defendant / Appellee:
FLORIDA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION, THOMAS R. GRADY, BEN GIBSON and others
Not Classified By Court:
SERVICE
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00044
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Hill v. S & S Recovery Inc
as 5:2022cv01517
Plaintiff:
Nia Hill
Defendant:
S & S Recovery Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-13115
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
S&S VENTURES, LLC v. SOUTHLAND WOOD RECYCLING, LLC et al
as 7:2022cv00090
Plaintiff:
S&S VENTURES LLC
Defendant:
SOUTHLAND WOOD RECYCLING LLC and LUCIUS WAYNE MOORE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sentury Tire USA, Inc. v. S & S Brokerage, Inc.
as 1:2022cv22613
Plaintiff:
Sentury Tire USA, Inc.
Defendant:
S & S Brokerage, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Sims et al v. Blockton et al
as 2:2022cv00745
Plaintiff:
Angelik Sims, H. S. S. and V. M. S., III
Defendant:
Nakita Blockton, Katherine E Thompkins and Dr. Alan Blotcky
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
