Cases 11 - 20 of 36
JONES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2020cv13562
Plaintiff:
THOMAS L JONES
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Wright National Flood Insurance Company
as 6:2018cv01489
Plaintiff:
Thomas E. Jones
Defendant:
Wright National Flood Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Jones v. Pon
as 5:2018cv01458
Plaintiff:
Thomas L Jones
Defendant:
Jeff T H Pon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Jeffrey Howe v. City Of Enterprise, et al
as 16-11453
Plaintiff - Appellee:
JEFFREY PAUL HOWE
Defendant - Appellant:
CITY OF ENTERPRISE, a municipal Corporation, BERNEY PARTRIDGE, an individual, in his individual capacity, THOMAS ARIAS, an individual, in his individual capacity and others
Kelly v. Cathey et al
as 5:2016cv00016
Plaintiff:
Neil Kelly
Defendant:
Diana C. Cathey, Ivory Jones, Estate of Thomas A. Jones, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Thomas Jones v. Corizon, et al
as 15-14003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS EDWARD JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
CORIZON, Medical Service Provider, JEAN DARBOUZE, Dr., MS. WILSON, Director of Nursing and others
Howe v. City of Enterprise et al
as 1:2015cv00113
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Paul Howe
Defendant:
City of Enterprise , Berney Partridge , Thomas Arias and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2014cv00173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Corizon et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2012cv00786
Plaintiff:
Thomas Edward Jones
Defendant:
Corizon, Jean Darbouze, Ms. Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thomas Jones v. S. L. Brown
as 12-13870
Plaintiff - Appellant:
THOMAS RENALDO JONES
Defendant - Appellee:
S. L. BROWN, Detective, 7742, J. S. HANSON, Detective, 63165, R. B. COLE, Detective, 6703 and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
