Cases 21 - 30 of 876
Williams v. Nexstar Media Group et al
as 1:2023cv00456
Plaintiff:
Wendy M. Williams
Defendant:
Nexstar Media Group, Perry Sooks, Geoff Armstrong and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PRYOR v. DOOLY STATE PRISON et al
as 5:2023cv00475
Plaintiff:
ERIK E PRYOR
Defendant:
DOOLY STATE PRISON, ARMSTRONG and ALTMA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pryor v. Dooly State Prison et al
as 4:2023cv00330
Plaintiff:
Erik E. Pryor
Defendant:
Dooly State Prison, Ms. Armstrong and Ms. Altma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBERTS v. WEBB et al
as 3:2023cv24696
Plaintiff:
JAVONEY DEVON ROBERTS
Defendant:
JAMES R WEBB, C SIMMONS and T ARMSTRONG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Armstrong v. American Strategic Insurance Corp.
as 0:2023cv62023
Plaintiff:
Christopher Armstrong
Defendant:
American Strategic Insurance Corp.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Insurance Contract
Evans v. CRST Expedited, Inc. et al
as 1:2023cv04829
Plaintiff:
Rex Evans
Defendant:
CRST Expedited, Inc., ACE American Insurance Company and Jonnathan Armstrong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Lancelot Armstrong v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections
as 23-13470
Petitioner / Appellant:
LANCELOT URILEY ARMSTRONG
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv34283
Plaintiff:
CODY ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
ARMSTRONG v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 9:2023cv32358
Plaintiff:
ZACHARY ARMSTRONG
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
