Cases 21 - 30 of 1,278
Rhodes v. Clay County Detention Center et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
William Alan Rhodes
Defendant:
Clay County Detention Center, Henry Lambert, Clay County, Alabama and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dustin v. Warden, Clay County Jail
as 3:2024cv00184
Petitioner:
Danny Richard Dustin
Respondent:
Warden, Clay County Jail
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Henry SmithIn re: Henry Smith
as 24-10456
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent:
MARY B. WINDOM, JENNIFER M. HOWELL, DONALD MCMILLIAN and others
Danny Dustin v. Director of Clay County Jail
as 24-10429
Petitioner:
DANNY RICHARD DUSTIN
Respondent:
DIRECTOR OF CLAY COUNTY JAIL
Inman v. Steinberg et al
as 1:2023cv05903
Plaintiff:
Devonia Inman
Defendant:
James Steinberg, Charles Whitley, Jeffrey Roesler and others
FDMH LLC v. Volusia County Building and Code Administration et al
as 6:2023cv02431
Plaintiff:
FDMH LLC
Defendant:
Volusia County Building and Code Administration, Kerry Leuzinger, George Recktenwald and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Windom et al
as 5:2023cv01733
Plaintiff:
Henry Clay Smith, .
Defendant:
Honorable Judge Mary B Windom and Jennifer M Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv05736
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
In re: Henry Smith
as 23-13920
Petitioner:
In re: HENRY CLAY SMITH
Respondent:
DONALD MCMILLIAN, MARY B. WINDOM and STATE OF ALABAMA
Disability Rights Florida, et al v. Secretary, State of Florida, et al
as 23-13727
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DISABILITY RIGHTS FLORIDA, VOTE.ORG, FLORIDA ALLIANCE FOR RETIRED AMERICANS and others
Defendant / Appellee:
SECRETARY, STATE OF FLORIDA, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR ALACHUA COUNTY, SUPERVISOR, ELECTIONS FOR BAKER COUNTY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
