Cases 21 - 30 of 295
DeBoer et al v. 3M Corporation et al
as 2:2023cv01059
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Dick DeBoer, Frank Huchro, Charles Robert Hudler and others
Intervenor Defendant:
Jimmie Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00444
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
DICKES v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2023cv17192
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY DICKES
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Glen Spivey v. Leonard Schiofman, et al
as 23-12091
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GLEN DALE SPIVEY
Defendant / Appellee:
LEONARD SCHIOFMAN, ISAAC MOORE, C. E. RICHARDSON and others
Kline et al v. Dick
as 1:2023cv02035
Plaintiff:
Tamara Kline and Greg Kline
Defendant:
Jan Dick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Williams v. Dick's Sporting Goods
as 1:2023cv01862
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Williams
Defendant:
Dick's Sporting Goods
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Hakeem v. Adams et al
as 6:2023cv00028
Plaintiff:
Vanessa Hakeem
Defendant:
Brian D. Adams, Jennifer Jarriel, Vashti J. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dicks v. Fipps
as 3:2023cv00409
Petitioner:
Stephen Michael Dicks
Respondent:
DEPUTY Robert Fipps and Robert Fipps
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00242
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
DICKS v. FIPPS
as 4:2023cv00137
Plaintiff:
STEPHEN MICHAEL DICKS
Defendant:
DEPUTY ROBERT FIPPS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
