Cases 21 - 30 of 1,241
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Sabillon et al
as 4:2024cv10019
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Edwin Sabillon and Samuel Carpentar
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. United States of America
as 5:2024cv00019
Petitioner:
Eric Lashawn Hayes
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Hendershot et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2024cv00138
Plaintiff:
Albert E Hendershot, Gerald Alameda, Lindell Algiere and others
Defendant:
3M Company, AGC Chemicals Americas, Inc, Amerex Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hayes, Cordney Mallory v. Carpentar et al
as 4:2024cv10014
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
S. Carpentar and J. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Oaks et al
as 4:2023cv10119
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Yasmin Oaks, Luis Ibarra, Talika Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hayes v. MCR Health, Inc.
as 8:2023cv02933
Plaintiff:
Keturah Hayes
Defendant:
MCR Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601 Family Medical Leave Act
Hayes, Cordney v. Linares
as 4:2024cv10012
Plaintiff:
Cordney Mallory Hayes
Defendant:
Joseph Linares
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Lochrie et al
as 5:2023cv00709
Plaintiff:
Trimard C. Campbell
Defendant:
FNU Lochrie, Deputy FNU Reid, FNU Duffy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
MALDONADO v. EMMONS et al
as 5:2023cv00505
Plaintiff:
PABLO F MALDONADO
Defendant:
WARDEN EMMONS, MAJOR JOHN DOE, OFFICER ALFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hayes v. Florida Food Products LLC
as 5:2023cv00720
Plaintiff:
Robert K. Hayes
Defendant:
Florida Food Products LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
