Cases 21 - 30 of 83
Thomas v. City of Atlanta et al
as 1:2022cv01527
Plaintiff:
Spencer Thomas
Defendant:
City of Atlanta, Erika Shields, Rodney Bryant and others
Swanson v. Cobb County Department of Family and Children Services et al
as 1:2021cv04978
Plaintiff:
Heather Swanson
Defendant:
Cobb County Department of Family and Children Services, Cobb County Police Department, Safepath Children Advocacy Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HOBBS v. COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
as 5:2021cv00164
Defendant:
ANDREW SAUL and COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY
Plaintiff:
Tammy Hobbs
Not Classified By Court:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION (NOTICE)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
HOBBS v. MACE et al
as 5:2021cv00062
Plaintiff:
GENIE HOBBS
Defendant:
HOUSTON COUNTY GEORGIA, JOHN DOES 1-3 and JIMMIE LEE MACE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Hobbs v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2020cv04497
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
Marisue Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv04009
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Hobbs v. Salem Holding Company et al
as 4:2020cv00151
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hobbs
Defendant:
Salem Holding Company and Salem Leasing Corporation doing business as Salem National Lease
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
HOBBS et al v. RANDALL-REILLY LLC et al
as 4:2019cv00009
Plaintiff:
TERRY FABRICANT, KEITH HOBBS and YVETTE GRIFFIN
Defendant:
YODEL TECHNOLOGIES LLC, RANDALL-REILLY LLC and UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC.
POOLE v. THOMASVILLE et al
as 7:2019cv00203
Plaintiff:
JAMES HUNTER POOLE
Defendant:
THOMASVILLE, JAY FLOWERS, MAX BEVERLY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hobbs v. Ethicon, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv03635
Defendant:
Ethicon, Inc. and Johnson & Johnson
Plaintiff:
James Hobbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
